|
Welcome to the September 2005 edition of the Mesh Consultants Safety Matters email newsletter. This newsletter is available on free subscription only and is our way of keeping you informed about developments in Health and Safety. To review or amend your subscription details, please see the notes at the end. In this issue: TUC concerned that too many still lose their lives at work HSE inspections of licensed premises start September in Dorset Nearly half a million workers suffer from repetitive strain injuries (RSI), according to study Bakery fined £176,000 for failure to provide a safe system of work HSE cautions companies to take proper precautions to prevent falls when working at height Company director has received a 12- month custodial sentence following the death of an employee Ramada Jarvis has been fined £ 400,000 for H&S failure National retailer Poundland fined £13,000 after pleading guilty to 2 breaches of H&S legislation
Progress towards reducing work-related deaths over the last 5
years has been slow. The construction and agriculture industries continue to see the most fatalities - combined, they account for over 50% of the total. Once again, falls from height was the cause of the most deaths, claiming 53 lives (almost 1 in 4). It is hoped that the new Work at Height Regulations should help to address this. HSC chair Bill Callaghan suggests that the regulations common sense approach "shouldn't be beyond anyone". On a positive note, the fatal injury rate was lower in all sectors apart from manufacturing. The HSE acknowledges that the challenge will be to continue this downward trend. Concerned with how to apply this common sense approach to working at
height? Then contact
MESH Consultants for a no-obligation discussion - we provide
advice, training and assistance in assessing your risks and offering
practical solutions.
Companies are warned that they face huge bills if they do not act to prevent their staff developing work-related RSI, as compensation for such claims can be costly. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) identify that simple procedures can be put in place to protect workers and businesses and reduce sick leave. The CPS believe the 3 simple steps needed are:
Bakery fined £150,000 and ordered to pay £26,000
costs after employee died from severe head injuries. The HSE inspector found that the company had not assessed the risks from un-jamming the racks, even though they jammed on a fairly frequent basis. He comments: "Maintenance activities cause a considerable number of serious and fatal incidents each year and companies should ensure that such activities are adequately planned and safe working practices established". Experience shows that in the majority of companies risk assessments tend to deal with the use of the equipment, not maintenance or cleaning, but this is when many accidents occur. Is this the case in your organisation? Do you need professional assistance
to identify
the main hazards in your workplace and ensure the correct controls
are in place? Take a look at the companies
that MESH has helped with risk assessment.
In 2004 the total number of falls stood at 42,260 and cost the economy approximately £800 million, £500 million of which is directly borne by business. It is estimated that each workplace fall costs £25,000 when absenteeism, insurance, wage and civil liability costs are taken into consideration. The campaign aims to raise awareness of the risks and about simple, cost-effective measures that can reduce both the impact on people and on finances. Justin McCracken, acting chief executive of the HSE, said: "Slips and trips are often seen as a bit of a joke. Although much of the time, we're able to get up and brush ourselves down, all too often the injury is more serious. During a normal working day, a person falls and seriously hurts him or herself in a British workplace every three minutes. Given that these are only recorded incidents, the actual figure will be significantly higher." The three main causes of falls are:
His colleague sustained broken limbs after falling at least 10 feet from a metal stillage that was balanced on the forks of the truck. Prosecuting HSE inspector Jenny Skeldon said: "Using a forklift truck as a way of elevating people is a highly dangerous practice and creates an imminent risk to safety. Both employers and employees have a duty to ensure that appropriate safety measures are taken when carrying out work that involves working at height in order to prevent injuries such as these." Are you aware of how to comply with the new Work at Height Regulations?
Do you and your employees need some advice or training? Then contact
MESH for a no-obligation discussion - we can offer expert advice
in this area.
The court heard that the employee sustained fatal injuries when attempting to clear a blockage from a paper shredding machine which started up whilst he was still inside it. A HSE investigation found that the machine was not securely isolated whilst the unblocking work was carried out, there was no safe system for such work, and the electrical controls for the machine were contaminated with dust. The HSE principle-investigating inspector, Paul Carter, said: "This was a horrific incident that was entirely foreseeable. Isolating the machinery, a safe system of work for clearing blockages, together with adequate instruction, training and supervision of Paul White's staff would have prevented this incident. Evidence showed that Paul White chose not to follow the advice of his health and safety consultant and instead adopted a complacent attitude". Paul Carter encourages "all employers to take a fresh look at
their business activities and to review their risk assessments to ensure
that sensible control measures are in place and that employees understand
what is expected of them."
An Health & Safety inspector discovered extremely serious damage to high level racking at the companies distribution depot. The damage indicated prolonged abuse by careless operation of forklift trucks in the warehouse. It was also discovered that fire exits were blocked by poorly organised storage. A prohibition notice was subsequently served on the blocking of the fire exits. Despite this on subsequent visits by the fire safety unit they found fire exits continued to be blocked, and a formal caution was issued to Poundland. Has your premises been assessed
for its fire risk as required by the Fire Precautions (Workplace)
Regulations 1997 (as amended)? If not contact
MESH for a no obligation discussion to see how we can help to
protect your business and employees.
|



