|
|
Welcome to the February 2010 edition of the MESH Consultants Safety Matters email newsletter. This newsletter is available on free subscription only and is our way of keeping you informed about developments in Health and Safety. To review or amend your subscription details, please see the notes at the end.
In this issue …
Guidance on corporate manslaughter and publicity orders recently published >
Plans to ban pre-employment health checks >
Slips, trips & falls calculated to be costing the UK around £800M per year >
Concerns raised that workers have become complacent over Swine Flu >
Company fined £10,000 after worker sustained serious injuries from falling onto a concrete floor >
Care home fined following scalding death >
Charity fined after death of worker >
Relaxed attitude to safety leads to farm accident >
Retailer New Look receives record fine for fire-safety breaches >
Bearings company exposes whole workforce to hazardous substance >
Are your company’s safety systems up to scratch or are you risking prosecution? At MESH we have extensive experience of helping companies to improve their health and safety and in many cases improve their competitiveness.
Guidance on corporate manslaughter and publicity orders recently published |
The Sentencing Guidelines Council (SGC) has published definitive guidelines on corporate manslaughter and health and safety offences causing death, intended to set out principles to guide courts in dealing with companies and organisations that cause death through a gross breach of care or where breach of health and safety requirements are a significant cause of the death. This can be found at http://www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk/docs/guideline_on_corporate_manslaughter.pdf
In addition, the Ministry of Justice has published a circular on the arrangements for implementing section 10 of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, which covers publicity orders.
Most of the Act’s provisions came into effect on 6 April 2008, but as publicity orders are an entirely new disposal, commencement was delayed until supporting guidelines were available for the courts in England and Wales. Therefore, as from 15 February 2010, organisations found guilty under the corporate manslaughter and homicide laws will potentially be liable to publicity orders.
In a statement on its definitive guidelines document, the SGC said: “The advice is clear — punitive and significant fines should be imposed both to deter and to reflect public concern at avoidable loss of life.”
The SGC added: “Fines for companies and organisations found guilty of corporate manslaughter may be millions of pounds and should seldom be below £500,000. For other health and safety offences that cause death, fines from £100,000 up to hundreds of thousands of pounds should be imposed.”
The first trial under the 2007 Act is due to start on 23 February 2010 at Bristol Crown Court.
Back to top
|
|
|
Plans to ban pre-employment health checks |
The use of pre-employment health checks could be made illegal if a Lords amendment to the Equality Bill becomes law. The House of Lords recently introduced the ground-breaking clause into the Equality Bill that would, for the first time, prevent employers asking candidates questions about their health that are unrelated to the job role.
The proposals focus on pre-employment inquiries and their place within the recruitment process.
The proposals suggest that employers should not be permitted to make use of pre-employment health-related questions that are not directly relevant to the candidate’s ability, in particular for the job for which he or she has applied.
According to the law firm Eversheds, employers who ask candidates about their health pre-job offer will be required to prove at tribunal that they did not discriminate against the individual if they did not get the job.
However, employers who ask candidates about their health after a job offer, and then discover they are not fit for the role, can make reasonable adjustments or justify their need to withdraw the job offer.
Back to top
|
|
Slips, trips & falls calculated to be costing the UK around £800M per year |
The HSE, in launching a hard hitting campaign, has identified that around 40 people lost their lives in the workplace last year from slip, trip and fall incidents. Overall the cost to society is estimated £800 million each year.
HSE figures show that slips and trips are the most common cause of major workplace injury in Britain. More workplace deaths are triggered by falls from height than any other cause, according to official statistics. In addition to 40 fatalities, there were over 15,000 major injuries to workers, as well as over 30,000 workers having to take over three days off work.
As well as the tragic human cost, preventable slips, trips and falls are having a serious financial impact on the UK. In response, HSE is launching a new phase of its Shattered Lives campaign, aimed at reducing slips, trips and falls in the workplace. The hard hitting campaign involves raising awareness of the impact of slips, trips and falls in the workplace and direct people to the new Shattered Lives websitewww.hse.gov.uk/shatteredlives for practical advice and guidance.
The campaign is targeted at those sectors where there are a high number of slips, trips and falls incidents each year, specifically, health and social care, education, food manufacturing, food retail, catering and hospitality, building and plant maintenance, and construction.
On the new campaign website, people will be able to find out information on how they can easily, and cost-effectively, reduce the risk of slips, trips and falls in the workplace, and see what other organisations have done. Advice ranges from how to deal with spills and other slip risks, to the importance of using ladders correctly to reduce the risk of falling from height.
Does your organisation suffer with slips, trips and falls and is it an area of health and safety that you don’t know how to deal with? At MESH we have extensive experience of helping companies to improve their health and safety controls; why not contact us to see how we could help you?
Back to top
|
|
Concerns raised that workers have become complacent over Swine Flu |
According to a health employment specialist people have grown increasingly complacent over the threat of swine flu, especially in the workplace. The concern has been raised that despite recently released Government figures have shown the number of new cases of the virus are falling, that employers still need to be on their guard.
There are still 211 patients in hospital with swine flu in England, 62 of whom are in critical care. The Health Protection Agency overall estimate of the number of cases in the last week remains below 5,000, which it has been for the last three weeks.
The advice is that employers need to be aware that, as long as people are still contracting swine flu, there is every chance that they will be running on empty with a seriously depleted workforce at some point in the near future. Where employers do not take adequate steps to manage this situation then it may be necessary to suspend workers with pay, on health and safety grounds.
Back to top
|
|
Company fined £10,000 after worker sustained serious injuries from falling onto a concrete floor |
The man was left with multiple fractures to his left foot and ankle after a colleague reversed into him whilst driving a fork lift truck.
It was identified that the fork-lift truck’s warning sound and reversing light were not working at the time of the accident and the injured man, who was loading pallets when he was hit, was wearing ear defenders and did not hear the truck behind him.
Since the accident he has not been able to return to work at the company, based in Houghton Le Spring, and has been told that he will never be able to return to full-time employment as a driver. As a result of the accident, he has to permanently use a stick.
Following the accident he contacted his union, which instructed its lawyers Thompsons Solicitors to pursue a claim for accident compensation. The case was complicated by his employers going into administration in February 2009 but damages were secured after the employers agreed to attend mediation.
Back to top
|
|
Care home fined following scalding death |
A care home firm has been fined £100,000 after a disabled teenager was fatally scalded in what a judge called an “easily avoidable” accident.
Paraplegic Yelena Hasselberg-Langley, 18, died in hospital four days after being lowered into the “excessively hot” water at a supported living centre in Owens Way, Oxford. London-based Lifeways Community Care, which runs the home, admitted health and safety breaches at a hearing last year and was fined £100,000 and ordered to pay £45,000 costs plus £15 victim surcharge at Oxford Crown Court.
On sentencing the judge said: “The case evokes a great deal of pity for her suffering and a sense of outrage that her ensuing scalding injury and death could have been easily avoided. She was blind, paraplegic, epileptic and severely disabled. She had some power of speech but couldn’t clearly communicate her distress when placed in the bath and she would have suffered excruciating agony before being taken to hospital.”
The Health and Safety Executive, which prosecuted the company, said the water was “excessively hot” at more than 44C (111.2F).
Back to top
|
|
Charity fined after death of worker |
A North East-based registered charity which provides support and housing services to people who suffer from mental health problems has been fined £30,000 and ordered to pay costs of £20,000 after one of its employees was attacked and killed by a service user.
A 22-year-old support worker employed by Mental Health Matters Ltd, was attacked and killed by service user Ronald Dixon. The court heard that she was visiting Ronald Dixon at his home when she was attacked and stabbed to death. She had started work with Mental Health Matters exactly six months prior to the date of her death and the attack occurred on the final day of her probation period.
The prosecution told the judge that her employment by Mental Health Matters exposed her to certain obvious risks, particularly in the context of her dealings with Mr Dixon. His mental health was known to be deteriorating and Mental Health Matters failed to respond to a number of warning signs. The court also heard that the charity failed to afford her the level of protection that the nature of her job warranted.
Mental Health Matters pleaded guilty to a charge brought by the HSE of breaching s.2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work, etc Act 1974 in failing to do all that was reasonably practicable to ensure the safety of their employee.
The service user, Ronald Dixon, pleaded guilty in October 2007 to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility and is detained indefinitely at Rampton Secure Hospital.
A source at the HSE said that the law requires employers and others to think about and deal with any health and safety risks before people should be allowed to work alone.
Is lone working an area that you have to manage in your organisation? Don’t know where to start? Then why not look at how MESH could assist you; we can save you the pain and ensure that you implement controls that keep both your employees safe and also protect your organisation.
Back to top
|
|
Relaxed attitude to safety leads to farm accident |
Daylesford Organic Farms Ltd was fined £65,000 and ordered to pay costs of £27,500 following the accident at the farm in Gloucestershire.
The accident occurred as a farm worker was being transported in the bucket of a tele-handler; the man fell out of the bucket as the vehicle was moving, and under the front wheels suffering severe crush injuries from which he died.
The HSE investigation found that the company did own a suitable riding platform which it could have attached to the forks of the vehicle but this needed repairing and was out of use. The culture had become such that riding in the bucket had become an acceptable practice. It was also found that the driver of the tele-handler had not been trained to drive it.
The HSE have stressed that travel in buckets of tele-handlers no matter how short the distance is not safe and not acceptable.
Back to top
|
Retailer New Look receives record fine for fire-safety breaches |
This follows a fire at its Oxford Street branch in 2007 that resulted in fire crews being on-site for 3 days and Oxford Street being closed for 2 days. New Look pleaded guilty in court and was fined £400,000 and ordered to pay costs of £136,052.
The first call to the fire brigade was only made when a worker in an adjacent building spotted it. The fire which started on the second floor had already broken through the second floor windows when the brigade arrived.
It was found that the fire alarm had been triggered by the fire but that the alarm was reset on at least one occasion. The building and surrounding premises were evacuated of around 450 people. The company was found not to have an adequate fire risk assessment in place, it also did not have appropriate emergency procedures nor had staff received sufficient training.
Back to top |
|
|
|
Bearings company exposes whole workforce to hazardous substance |
The HSE commenced a prosecution on Koyo Bearings (Europe) Ltd after it was found that the entire workforce had been exposed to metal-working fluid which was being emitted from more than 100 machines used to manufacture ball bearings.
The machines used water-based chemicals during manufacturing but the process included spraying metal-working fluid onto a fast rotating piece of metal to keep it cool whilst it was being cut. The machines were not enclosed and there was not local exhaust ventilation system in place to prevent staff coming into contact with the substance that is a known cause of occupational asthma and extrinsic allergic alveolitis.
A HSE inspection identified that over a two year period the company had reported on 15 cases of occupational asthma (the second largest exposure of its kind in the UK). The HSE identified the working practices at the factory were both inadequate and dangerous; which put the whole workforce at risk.
The company pleaded guilty and was fined £20,000 and ordered to pay costs of £15,280.
Do you have staff that work with or around hazardous substances in your workplace? Do you need some expert advice on how to comply with the COSHH regulations and how to protect the long-term health of your staff? If yes then take a look at some of the companies MESH has assisted.
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for reading this edition of our email newsletter. Please do feel free to pass it onto colleagues, who can also subscribe for free via our web site.
All information supplied to us in order for you to receive our newsletters is protected by our privacy policy.
If you would like to send feedback or ask us anything at all about health and safety, please do contact us. We are always happy to give no-obligation advice.
If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter please just reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. |
|
|