|
|
Welcome to the December 2010 edition of the MESH Consultants Safety Matters email newsletter. This newsletter is available on free subscription only and is our way of keeping you informed about developments in Health and Safety. To review or amend your subscription details, please see the notes at the end.
In this issue …
Concerns raised that HSE budget cut could reverse good record on work deaths and ill health
Survey identifies that nearly half of UK workplaces not visited by enforcing inspector
Poundstretcher fined over £50,000 over fire safety breaches
Worker paralysed after being crushed by reel of paper
Firm fined over nitrogen knockout
Apprentice injured during maintenance work
HSE issues warning about explosion risks from cutting of drums and containers
Company fined £160,000 after worker losses fingers
Compensation to delivery driver injured at work after falling from vehicle
Are your company’s safety systems up to scratch or are you risking prosecution? At MESH we have extensive experience of helping companies to improve their health and safety and in many cases improve their competitiveness.
|
|
Concerns raised that HSE budget cut could reverse good record on work deaths and ill health |
The concerns have been raised by the TUC who feel that cutting the HSE budget by at least 35% could lead to death and injury rates increasing. This view has also been expressed by IOSH who are concerned that the lack of front line inspectors could put lives at risk.
The HSE has not commented on the exact nature of the cost cuts except to say that a review is to be undertaken.
This comes at the time that the HSE has released provisional data for 2009/10 showing a 15% drop in the number of people killed at work as well as a significant drop in major and over 3 day injuries.
The fatality rate of 0.5% per 100,000 workers compares favourably with the EU average rate of 2.1%.
However, the number of people suffering from an illness caused, or made worse by their work rose from 1.2 million to 1.3 million.
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Survey identifies that nearly half of UK workplaces not visited by enforcing inspector |
The TUC have called the failure to inspect more workplaces as being a scandal; they cite that knowing that an inspector is likely to visit as one of the key drivers to changing an employer’s focus towards health and safety.
According to the survey 61% of employers look to make improvements where they perceive the possibility of an inspection taking place.
The HSE has conceded that inspection does play a vital part in improving safety performance but has emphasied that in the majority of workplaces it is leadership and worker involvement that creates the right safety culture. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
Poundstretcher fined over £50,000 over fire safety breaches |
The company has been fined more than £50,000 for breaching fire safety regulations which turned one of its stores into a “death trap”. Leeds Crown Court heard how a fire safety inspector uncovered a catalogue of failings inside the budget retailer’s store at Castleford, West Yorkshire which put the lives of staff and shoppers at risk.
The store is large enough to hold a total of 420 people – 300 people on the ground floor, 100 on the first floor and 20 members of staff – but only one fire escape out of a possible six was available to use, and large amounts of combustible material blocked routes to the exits.
The inspector found that people could have exited the shop through a fire door into the stairwell, but that the door would have locked behind them and they may have ended up trapped and unable to get through the next fire door.
Huddersfield-based Poundstretcher Ltd pleaded guilty to seven charges of breaching fire safety regulations, which included offences relating to general fire precautions, a risk assessment review, emergency routes and exits and training.
The company was fined a total of £51,500 and ordered to pay costs of £3,449.75.
Does your organisation have a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment in place or are you risking prosecution? At MESH we have extensive experience of helping companies to improve their fire safety systems through a comprehensive fire risk assessment and action plan; why not look at some examples of companies we have worked with? |
Back to top |
|
|
|
Worker paralysed after being crushed by reel of paper |
An employee of a major paper producer in North Wales has been left paralysed from the chest down after being crushed by a two tonne reel of paper. The man was working as an assistant winder for SCA Hygiene Products UK Ltd when the incident occurred.
He was involved in producing and preparing paper reels at the firm’s site in Oakenholt, Flint. He was using his body weight to slow down a moving paper reel when he slipped. The reel, which was around two metres in diameter, then rolled onto him causing serious crush injuries which left him with paralysis.
The HSE prosecuted the firm after an investigation and at Mold Crown Court it pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It was fined £120,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £18,514.
The lead HSE inspector commented that there were clear risks that weren’t properly managed by the company, which resulted in these horrific injuries. The consequences of this incident could have been even more serious. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
Firm fined over nitrogen knockout |
A recycling firm has been fined £13,000 after a worker passed out while using nitrogen gas. The incident took place at Overton Recycling’s site in Lye, when a 47-year-old member of staff climbed into the chute of a fridge recycling machine last July.
The Court was told that the man was working on the machine used to recycle fridges. Due to the explosive risk when fridges are broken up in the machine, nitrogen gas is used to reduce such dangers.
The court heart that sometimes fridges would get stuck in the chutes and it was normal for workers to climb in to clear any blockages.
On the day of the incident the worker passed out while doing so and subsequent investigations by the HSE found the levels of nitrogen in the chute had not been assessed properly. The HSE also found that Overton Recycling failed to sufficiently assess risks regarding workers climbing into confined spaces, adding that it should have had techniques in place for clearing blockages which wouldn’t have led to workers getting into the chute.
The company was fined after admitting health and safety breaches, and was also ordered to pay £6,107 in legal costs. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
Apprentice injured during maintenance work |
A young worker suffered a fractured skull at Goodyear Dunlop during maintenance work on a faulty machine. He was working with two other maintenance engineers to repair a tyre press which had failed to open at the end of its cycle.
The maintenance team attempted to manually override the machines controls but this did not work; so they decided to call for an electrician. When he arrived he disconnected the electrical coil from the controls and pressed the machines back press; which led to the machine re-energising and burst the internal bladder. The shock startled the apprentice who leapt backwards and struck his head on another machine. He was off work for two months due to the injuries sustained.
The HSE investigation found that the maintenance team had not been trained on how to repair the machine and the instructions were in Italian.
The company pleaded guilty in court and were fined £18,250 and ordered to pay costs of £4,807. The company also has a prior conviction at the same factory in 2008; on that occasion it was fined £13,500. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
HSE issues warning about explosion risks from cutting of drums and containers |
Employees contemplating ‘hot work’ on used containers, and managers overseeing it, are being urged to check that the correct working procedures are followed after two people were killed in separate incidents in North East Scotland whilst cutting up drums.
‘Hot work’ includes any process that generates a source of ignition, such as naked flames, heat or sparks arising from working methods such as welding, flame cutting, grinding and using disc cutters.
The HSE has issued a Safety Alert to remind duty holders of the risk of explosion when undertaking ‘hot work’ on containers that contain, or have contained, flammable or combustible substances like waste thinners, new or used engine oil, anti-freeze, solvents, petrol or diesel fuel.
The use of these materials is widespread across industries such as Engineering, Manufacturing, Motor Vehicle Repair and Agriculture, and although some containers may appear to be empty, sufficient liquid residue can exist in seams, creases or folds in the container to give rise to explosive vapours.
Even where the contents of a container may not have been classified as flammable under normal conditions, hot work can generate such extreme temperatures that the contents may ignite.
HSE Principal Inspector Edward Marshall, comments;
“This alert is not issuing new guidance but is to ensure all relevant workers are aware and familiar with the comprehensive advice that already exists. It is essential that all employees have had the right training for the job and know what precautions to take to protect themselves and others.”
The Safety Alert can be found at www.hse.gov.uk/safetybulletins/hotwork.htm. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
Company fined £160,000 after worker losses fingers |
Mersen Scotland Holytown Limited was fined £160,000 for a breach of Health and Safety legislation which resulted in serious injury to a worker.
The incident took place at the premises of the accused at Eurocentral in Holytown; the worker was removing a bag from the dust filtration system when his left hand was caught in the rotary valve, severing all four fingers and his thumb. Although surgeons were able to reattach three of his fingers, they will never regain their full function, and it was not possible to reattach his thumb or ring finger. As a result of this incident, he is permanently impaired and disfigured.
The investigation identified that the incident resulted entirely from basic health and safety failures and should have been easy to predict and prevent.
The HSE has commented that if the work had been properly assessed the risk associated with access to dangerous moving parts of the machinery would have been identified and could have been controlled. The company also failed to provide the man with adequate supervision or training on the health and safety implications of the work he was doing.
The HSE has identfied that this case should serve to remind employers and employees of the dangers presented by moving parts of machinery. They have said they will continue to hold companies to account when they fail in basic health and safety duties which could result in severe injuries to employees.
Do your risk assessments identify the risks of working with machinery and does this extend to tasks such as maintenance and cleaning? We have often found that companies only realise their assessments are not fully comprehensive when an accident occurs. Do you want to be in this position? If the answer is no then why not contact us for a no obligation discussion? |
Back to top |
|
|
|
Compensation to delivery driver injured at work after falling from vehicle |
The man was working as a delivery driver for a pine furnishing company, delivering furniture to a local residential address. Upon arrival, as he attempted to step down from his vehicle, he fell and landed on the ground, sustaining injury to his collar bone.
He was immediately taken to hospital by his colleague and was found to have sustained a fractured collar bone as a result of the accident.
Law firm Irwin Mitchell made a claim against the client’s employer, based on failure to ensure that the employee was provided with appropriate equipment for the task he was undertaking. The man received £6,250 in compensation. |
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for reading this edition of our email newsletter. Please do feel free to pass it onto colleagues, who can also subscribe for free via our web site.
All information supplied to us in order for you to receive our newsletters is protected by our privacy policy.
If you would like to send feedback or ask us anything at all about health and safety, please do contact us. We are always happy to give no-obligation advice.
If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter please just reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. |
|
|
|
|
|